Archive for the ‘Lending’ Category

Mortgage fraud up nearly four-fold

Monday, August 9th, 2010

Mortgage fraud has nearly quadrupled in value during the first six months of 2010, according to KPMG’s Fraud Barometer.

21 cases with a value of £96 million were reported – compared to the same period during 2009, where there were 18 cases worth just £24 million. Indeed, the whole of 2009 saw a total of only £77 million.

Mortgage fraud accounted for over half of all fraud committed against the financial sector in this period.

One of the biggest cases was worth £50 million, involving two solicitors who were charged with commercial mortgage fraud in relation to obtaining a money transfer by deception and dishonesty, while an estate agent was jailed for six years after attempting to pull off a £2 million mortgage fraud after stealing the identities of two homeowners.

Hitesh Patel, Partner, KPMG Forensic commented on the figures:

“The fact that increasing amounts of mortgage fraud are being prosecuted is cold comfort for the financial services industry. Clearly, more of it is coming to light and more will follow. It is highly probable that the issue is far bigger than our figures demonstrate.

“This is a legacy issue for the banks from the pre-recession boom years when house prices inflated, providing the opportunity for fraud.  Banks will be hoping that they have uncovered most of their fraudulent loans.  But the trend remains upwards and it could be some time before we see the peak.”

Overall, the Fraud Barometer, which considers serious cases of fraud with charges in excess of £100,000 in the UK courts, found 166 cases of serious fraud in the first half of this year – the highest number of cases in a six month period in the Barometer’s 22 year history.

The cases had a total value of £608.5 million – down 4.3 per cent for the same six month period in 2009 (£636.5 million).

However, the 2009 figures were inflated by one case worth £200 million on its own, whereas in this period the biggest case was worth £66 million, meaning that without this outlier the average value per case has risen.

Management wreak fraud havoc

Managers in companies inflicted far greater fraud damage than their employees, KPMG’s figures show. Though there were more employee cases than management ones (47 compared to 32), management frauds had a far greater value, at £135 million compared to £45 million.

At an average value of over £4 million per case compared to £1 million per employee case, managers are clearly able to carry out larger frauds due to their positions of greater authority and the trust they are afforded.    

One example was of a Birmingham finance boss who manipulated the profits of a steel supply firm to ensure a bonus by falsifying the company’s accounting records. He spent over £100,000 at a local lap dancing club, and by doing so 11 redundancies had to be made at the firm, which was nearly bought to its knees as a result of his actions.

Professional criminals remain public enemy number one

Professional criminals perpetrated the most fraud during the period – 56 cases were reported at a value of £391 million, over half the total amount included in the Barometer. Often, professional criminals are targeting investors.

21 such cases totalling £185 million were recorded in the first six months of 2010. Financial institutions were also widely targeted in 48 cases worth £172 million.

‘Boiler room’ schemes are also a favourite scam for many professional fraudsters. Typically they involve firms operating from outside the UK where they try and persuade investors to part with money for shares that are worthless and impossible to sell-on, often at inflated prices.

Vulnerable individuals are targeted which may make their often difficult situation even worse. The Barometer recorded five cases of boiler room fraud, totalling £84 million over the six month period.

Hitesh Patel comments:

“While interest rates remain low, it unsurprising that investors who are looking for new ways to grow their capital, remain susceptible to being targeted by fraudsters. At the same time, professional criminals show themselves to be highly adaptable and always looking for new scams.

“As soon as one avenue is blocked, they will move on to another one.  That is why it is important for investors to remain continually vigilant.”

Government departments targeted by fraudsters

Government was targeted in 38 cases worth £178 million: a number of government frauds were tax scams involving benefits, VAT, or carousel fraud, as Hitesh Patel comments:

“At a time when the country has a huge deficit, it’s clear that government needs to do all it can to protect itself from fraud and claw back lost funds.

“It becomes a problem that affects us all.  Contrary to popular perception, fraud is not a victimless crime, particularly at a time when social welfare and infrastructure budgets need to be carefully protected.  Any losses to fraud are losses from those budgets.”

London and the South East – fraud hotspot

Regionally, London and the South East remains the biggest hotspot for fraudsters – the region accounts for over half of the total cases (88), which equates to a staggering 81 per cent (£493 million) by value. The North East is its nearest rival, with 26 cases reported at a value of £43 million.

Turning risk to advantage

Finally, the Fraud Barometer demonstrates the importance of ensuring that companies have mechanisms to prevent fraud and detect misconduct effectively.

Hitesh Patel concludes:

“Companies who took fraud risk management seriously before the downturn should now be emerging stronger because of it.

“The discipline that they have subjected their businesses to should help them gain a competitive advantage while their competitors get distracted in their reactive combat against fraud and misconduct as the economy recovers.”

New capital requirements for banks

Wednesday, July 7th, 2010

Following today’s vote in the European Parliament, Commissioner Michel Barnier welcomes the agreement by Council and Parliament on new capital requirements for banks.

He says:

“The amendments to the Capital Requirements Directive voted today by the European Parliament target the investments and practices that lie at the root of the recent crisis.

“The requirements on pay and bonuses send a strong political message: there will be no return to business as usual. The EU is leading the way in curbing unsound remuneration practices in banks. Banks will need to change radically their practices and the mentality that have led in many cases to excessive risk-taking and contributed to the financial crisis.

The tougher capital requirements for banks’ trading books and their investments in securitisations – the kind of highly complex products that have caused huge losses for banks – will ensure that banks hold significantly more capital to cover their risks. This will make the sector as whole better able to resist stress.”

Remuneration

With regard to remuneration, the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) primarily aims at giving effect at EU level to the Financial Stability Board (FSB) principles and standards on compensation agreed by G20 leaders. The Directive will require credit institutions and investment firms to have remuneration policies that are consistent with effective risk management.

The Directive pursues three objectives:

- To impose a binding obligation on credit institutions and investment firms to have remuneration policies and practices that are consistent with and promote sound and effective risk management, accompanied by high level principles on sound remuneration;

- To bring remuneration policies within the scope of the supervisory review under the CRD, so that supervisors would be able to require the firm to take measures to rectify any problems that they might identify;

- To ensure that supervisors may also impose financial or non-financial penalties (including fines) against firms that fail to comply with the obligation.

The new rules on remuneration can apply as early as 1 January 2011 with principles on remuneration applying to all variable remuneration payable on or after this date, including when it was awarded in 2010.

Capital Requirements for trading book and securitisations

The Capital Requirements Directive will strengthen banks’ capital position and increase market confidence through reform of the capital rules for the trading book and for securitisations:

- Capital requirements for the trading book: The trading book consists of financial instruments that a bank holds with the intention of re-selling them in the short term, or in order to hedge other instruments in the trading book. The new rules reform the way that banks assess the risks connected with their trading books to ensure that the assessment takes full account of the potential losses in the kind of stressed conditions experienced during the recent crisis. These revised rules will substantially increase levels of capital held against the trading book.

- Capital requirements for complex securitisations: Complex securitisations played a role in the development of the financial crisis, when banks incurred unexpectedly high losses in such instruments. The new rules impose higher capital requirements for re-securitisations, to reflect properly the very considerable losses that banks holding complex securitisations can be exposed to in certain circumstances.

- Disclosure of securitisation exposures: The new rules will reinforce disclosure requirements to ensure adequate disclosure of the risks to which banks are exposed through their securitisation positions. Proper disclosure of the level of risks to which banks are exposed is necessary for market confidence.

The new rules on trading book and securitisations can apply as early as 31 December 2011.

Tips for Eliminating your Debts

Friday, January 29th, 2010

For many people, balancing the budget means just one thing – being able to make ends meet to pay bills every month. Often half these bills are loan repayments on a car and a mortgage. After this there is the payment of credit card balances; with many credit card companies charging anything from 10% to 18% on the outstanding credit card balance.  Even at 10% interest, this quickly becomes a tidy sum in the way of monthly interest for those who use their credit cards frequently.

Basically, living on credit is as bad a survival strategy as can be and it leaves nothing for an emergency. To be able to cope with emergencies, and to save something for a rainy day, you should concentrate on wiping out outstanding credit card balances. To do this you firstly should consider methods of bringing down the credit accumulated on your credit cards.

One option is to go to a bank that offers a low interest bank loan. If a bank loan is available at an interest rate lower than the interest rate of any credit card debt, then availing that loan is a viable option. Should you go for this option, then remember to go for a fixed interest rate and not a floating interest rate. A floating interest rate could sometimes become higher than the interest rate on the credit card, even if it wasn’t at the time you took the loan out. Furthermore, such a bank loan should only be taken on if you are sure to discontinue ongoing use of your credit cards, and you are certain that your monthly budget allows you to repay the loan consistently. To do otherwise would be counterproductive.

Another option is to seek out a credit card companies that offers lower interest rates if transfer an outstanding balance of a previous credit card to that company. This can be an effective money saving formula if you do some homework through the internet. In this way you can reduce the interest you are paying and start making inroads on the core debt as well; queries should be done to zero in on such a company before you commit to this option.

Of course, these are solutions for those who have already accumulated credit debt. If you are thinking about getting a credit card and don’t want to fall into this trap, then think about the fact that the best way to avoid the pitfalls is by not having credit in the first place. Controlling and limiting credit card use is the first step towards lessening credit balances. Pay cash as often as you can and use a credit card only when it is unavoidable. Try to stick with one credit card only to keep track of your spending more easily. Too many credit cards can make it easier to rack up a lot of debt inadvertently. You can avoid this by sticking with one credit card which you pay in full and regularly.

To take things one step further, using a credit card continuously to tide over ‘emergencies’ is not sufficient. What you truly need is to have a budget to manage your money more effectively, instead of relying on credit. Aim to always put something aside every month; going above and beyond paying off credit debt. Those who have too much credit should first pay it off and then concentrate on not accruing more credit. Availability of credit leads people into an illusory world of financial security; thinking they have more than they in fact do. Of course, some sort of a monthly payment for a car or house might be necessary. The key is to be savvy about what you borrow and be sure these loans are realistic for your particular situation. When you opt for a loan, be realistic about the amount you can afford to spend on your car or home loan so that the monthly payments don’t strain the budget.

To truly eliminate bad credit and to be secure that you have everything you genuinely need, then budget a small provision so that you have savings being regularly made over and above paying back credit card debt and other financial commitments. If you fail to make these provisions, then you will soon slip into a financial ‘danger zone’.

If you are unfortunately beyond this and cannot afford to repay your debts on a monthly basis, then you should look at some of the other debt solution options that are available to you. On most debt repayment services in the market there is a good chance interest and late payment charges can be stopped. This means that even though you will be making smaller payments towards your debts you will still be able to make inroads to the debt and making all your monthly payments more affordable.

If you have any good money making tips or thoughts then please post them here

Consumers ‘do not trust’ their banks

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

British consumers do not trust their banks to treat them fairly, research by money.co.uk has found.

Only seven per cent of the people questioned said they believed their institution would treat them fairly.

Meanwhile, 25 per cent of respondents stated that they did not trust their bank at all.

But with 15 per cent feeling that banks do not apply fees fairly for unauthorised charges, only the same percentage of people think changing their bank would make any difference to how charges are applied to their accounts.

Chris Morling, managing director, money.co.uk said: “Based on these findings, I believe the banks have much work to do if they are to win back our trust – particularly when it comes to individual treatment and ‘fair play’.”

The price comparison site estimated before Christmas that 71 per cent of British adults paid for their celebrations using money they had available at the time, rather than spreading the cost throughout the coming year.

Post your thoughts. How do you feel about your bank?

Consumers ‘turn to credit’ for daily costs

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

Increasing numbers of shoppers are paying for their purchases with credit cards as they struggle to make ends meet, the Post Office has stated.

According to their research, 38 per cent of adults are using credit cards this month to fund shopping for their groceries, an eight per cent increase on the number doing the same last year.

It is also estimated that a further ten per cent will spend more on their money this year than in 2009, with three per cent of people planning to apply for another credit card to boost their credit limits.

Post Office head of lending Az Alibhai said: “While the recession has left many with no choice, these debts build up quickly if not paid off in full each month and can be extremely costly over time when interest is added.”

Barclaycard: Credit card use up over Christmas

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

More people chose to pay using credit cards over Christmas 2009 compared to the previous year, according to research by Barclaycard.

Between December 19th and 31st, payments were up by 2.4 per cent on the year before, working out to a total of £4,085 million, compared to £3,989 million spent in 2008.

On December 23rd alone, £497 million was spent by consumers out for last-minute Christmas gifts.

As bargain hunters headed out into the sales, £376 million was spent using plastic on December 29th.

Marc Pettican, head of sales at Barclaycard Global Payment Acceptance, said: “We’ve also seen a stronger post-Christmas performance as shoppers take advantage of the sales discounts and consider the effects of the imminent VAT increase”.

In the run up to the festive period, supermarket spending increased the most as shoppers got their Christmas food in, rising by 15.2 per cent, with service station transactions up by 24.9 per cent.

Brits cutting back on their Christmas spends

Saturday, December 5th, 2009

On average, British adults are spending less on Christmas than they did ten years ago, according to research by Saga Platinum credit card.

Are you cutting back over christmas this year or is this all hype?