Archive for July, 2010

FSA propose new mortgage rules‎

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has today outlined proposals to ensure all mortgages are carefully assessed to make sure borrowers can afford them.

Reflecting the FSA’s enhanced consumer protection strategy and intensive day-to-day supervision, the proposed changes aim to ensure all lenders get back to the basics of responsible lending and that problems are prevented before they can develop or get out of control.

Some of the key proposals include:

- Imposing affordability tests for all mortgages and making lenders ultimately responsible for assessing a consumer’s ability to pay;

- Requiring verification of borrowers’ income in every case to prevent over inflation of income and to prevent mortgage fraud;

- Extra protection for vulnerable customers with a credit-impaired history.

The tough new proposals, published in the consultation paper, form part of a major review by the FSA into the UK mortgage market and are based on detailed analysis of past lending decisions, looking at the causes of arrears and repossessions since 2005.

The FSA found that:

- 46% of households either had no money left, or had a shortfall after mortgage payments and living costs were deducted from their income;

- Almost half of new mortgages between 2007 and the first quarter of 2010 were provided without a customer having to verify their income;

- The share of interest-only mortgages has been increasing. At the peak of the market, over 30% of all mortgages were interest-only;

- Many consumers with no repayment vehicle count on future house price rises or uncertain life events to repay their mortgage and some have no plan at all;

- Borrowers with a credit-impaired history are particularly vulnerable.

Lesley Titcomb, FSA director responsible for the mortgage market, said:

“There is a clear link between financial overstretch and mortgage arrears and repossessions, and we are determined to protect vulnerable consumers by making sure that everyone who takes on a mortgage can afford to pay it back.  

“While it is clear the mortgage market has worked well for many, we need to build a strong new framework to protect mortgage customers and to ensure that the problems we have seen in the past do not happen again, particularly as the mortgage market recovers.”

Today’s report also includes the key findings from the FSA’s review into arrears charges, which indicated significant variation in the level of arrears fees across the market.  

The mortgage rules require arrears charges to be based on a reasonable estimate of the cost of the additional administration required as a result of the customer being in arrears.

The FSA is actively seeking views from consumer groups and industry and invites responses by 16 November 2010.

Payplan, the free debt advice provider, has welcomed the FSA’s latest changes to the way lenders should treat customers in arrears, particularly the requirement for lenders to consider all options for borrowers before taking action for possession of the property.

According to Managing Director, John Fairhurst, most Payplan clients with mortgage arrears also have a range of unsecured debts (typically of around £40,000).  

He said:

 “In our experience, mortgage arrears need to be dealt within the context of the overall financial situation that the customer finds himself.

“In trials where we are working with a small number of mortgage lenders to talk to their clients who are in arrears, we have found that by engaging the customer about the totality of their debt situation we are nearly always better able to effect a solution that stabilises and makes the client’s repayments on his unsecured debt more manageable, leaving a greater proportion of available income to put towards improving the mortgage arrears situation.

“Without having to run the risk of giving advice, lenders adopting a more holistic approach to their customers’ arrears problems, can turn the FSA’s new rules to their own advantage put more customers back on the straight and narrow and fulfil their obligations under TCF.

“Rather than being an extra burden, lenders should see the FSA’s requirements to consider all options for clients in debt as an opportunity to help tackle underlying unsecured debt liabilities at source and thereby free up more disposable income for repayment of mortgage arrears.”

CML director general Michael Coogan said:

“There will always be a regulatory trade-off between protecting consumers from over-borrowing, and increasing the barriers to home-ownership. The mortgage market for the time being has already corrected, to a degree that the main consumer concern right now is about access to finance, not about risky lending.

“The risk is that the gain will not match the pain in the short term. The industry and consumers will feel the costs of imposing new regulatory requirements now, in a market where they are not needed, but the potential consumer benefits will only be felt at some unspecified time in the future.

“We look forward to working with the FSA to ensure that a pragmatic approach to implementation can be adopted as far as possible, to reduce the negative side-effects that may arise from well-intentioned regulation.

“There is also a need to manage the regulatory burden that may emerge if the UK proceeds with changes just at the time that the European Commission is also due to publish proposals on the same aspects of mortgage regulation.”

3 in 4 oblivious to impact of rate rises

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

Three-quarters of homeowners do not know what impact an interest rate hike would have on them, according to research from the new government-backed consumer education body.

Around 74% of people with a mortgage admitted they did not know how a 1% rise in the Bank of England base rate would affect their monthly outgoings, according to the Consumer Financial Education Body (CFEB).

More worryingly, 15% of people do not even know what type of mortgage they have, such as whether it is a fixed rate deal, meaning they would be unaffected by an interest rate rise, or whether it is a variable rate one, meaning their monthly payments would go up.

A further 15% also do not know when their current mortgage deal comes to an end.

The lack of awareness comes despite the fact that 51% of people with a mortgage expect interest rates to rise during the coming nine months. Economists, meanwhile, expect the first rate rise to be around April or May next year.

Just over half of people said they had no plans to review their mortgage, or would leave doing so until just before their existing deal expired, while 14% admitted they did not know what they would cut back on if their mortgage repayments rose by £200 a month.

 

Tony Hobman, chief executive of the Consumer Financial Education Body, said: ‘Interest rates have been at record lows for some while now.

‘Although there is uncertainty about when this will change, it is clear from our research that many people with mortgages haven’t thought about what it would mean for their monthly payments, or where they would find the extra money in their household budget if their mortgage rate was to go up.

 

‘Lack of time means many of us often put off reviewing our finances, but it doesn’t have to be time consuming to keep on top of your money matters.’

 

The group advises people to look at the ‘Keyfacts’ document they were given when they took out their mortgage, as this shows what their current interest rate is and when their deal expires.

 

The CFEB was set up in April by the Financial Services Authority to take over responsibility for consumer financial education.

New capital requirements for banks

Wednesday, July 7th, 2010

Following today’s vote in the European Parliament, Commissioner Michel Barnier welcomes the agreement by Council and Parliament on new capital requirements for banks.

He says:

“The amendments to the Capital Requirements Directive voted today by the European Parliament target the investments and practices that lie at the root of the recent crisis.

“The requirements on pay and bonuses send a strong political message: there will be no return to business as usual. The EU is leading the way in curbing unsound remuneration practices in banks. Banks will need to change radically their practices and the mentality that have led in many cases to excessive risk-taking and contributed to the financial crisis.

The tougher capital requirements for banks’ trading books and their investments in securitisations – the kind of highly complex products that have caused huge losses for banks – will ensure that banks hold significantly more capital to cover their risks. This will make the sector as whole better able to resist stress.”

Remuneration

With regard to remuneration, the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) primarily aims at giving effect at EU level to the Financial Stability Board (FSB) principles and standards on compensation agreed by G20 leaders. The Directive will require credit institutions and investment firms to have remuneration policies that are consistent with effective risk management.

The Directive pursues three objectives:

- To impose a binding obligation on credit institutions and investment firms to have remuneration policies and practices that are consistent with and promote sound and effective risk management, accompanied by high level principles on sound remuneration;

- To bring remuneration policies within the scope of the supervisory review under the CRD, so that supervisors would be able to require the firm to take measures to rectify any problems that they might identify;

- To ensure that supervisors may also impose financial or non-financial penalties (including fines) against firms that fail to comply with the obligation.

The new rules on remuneration can apply as early as 1 January 2011 with principles on remuneration applying to all variable remuneration payable on or after this date, including when it was awarded in 2010.

Capital Requirements for trading book and securitisations

The Capital Requirements Directive will strengthen banks’ capital position and increase market confidence through reform of the capital rules for the trading book and for securitisations:

- Capital requirements for the trading book: The trading book consists of financial instruments that a bank holds with the intention of re-selling them in the short term, or in order to hedge other instruments in the trading book. The new rules reform the way that banks assess the risks connected with their trading books to ensure that the assessment takes full account of the potential losses in the kind of stressed conditions experienced during the recent crisis. These revised rules will substantially increase levels of capital held against the trading book.

- Capital requirements for complex securitisations: Complex securitisations played a role in the development of the financial crisis, when banks incurred unexpectedly high losses in such instruments. The new rules impose higher capital requirements for re-securitisations, to reflect properly the very considerable losses that banks holding complex securitisations can be exposed to in certain circumstances.

- Disclosure of securitisation exposures: The new rules will reinforce disclosure requirements to ensure adequate disclosure of the risks to which banks are exposed through their securitisation positions. Proper disclosure of the level of risks to which banks are exposed is necessary for market confidence.

The new rules on trading book and securitisations can apply as early as 31 December 2011.

Savers pay the price for mortgage cuts

Monday, July 5th, 2010

Savers taking out a fixed rate bond today will receive up to 23.3% less interest than they would have nine months ago.

Moneyfacts figures show that 29% of savers are looking to fix their interest rate, with the average amount invested in a fixed rate bond standing at £36,872.

Savers investing the average amount nine months ago would have received £1,209 in interest, compared to just £978 today.

Michelle Slade, Spokesperson for Moneyfacts.co.uk, commented:

“Providers are focused on mortgage lending and as they strive to attract new business by reducing mortgage rates, they are in turn cutting savings rates to balance the books.

“Uncertainty over when bank base rate will rise means most savers are only taking a short term view, but they are being punished by the biggest reductions in rates.

“At 2.62%, the average rate on a one year bond stands at an all time low.

“Prudent savers who rely on the interest from their savings to supplement their income continue to be hit the hardest.

“Inflation also continues to take its toll on savers and is effectively depreciating the value of savers’ capital.

“Savers hoping for incentives from last month’s Budget were left bitterly disappointed and many continue to feel their needs have been forgotten during the credit crisis.

“With a change in bank base rate still predicted to be a little way off, the situation for savers is likely to get worse before it gets better.

“To limit the effects of falling rates, savers need to review their portfolio regularly to ensure they are receiving competitive rates.”

Abbey announces interest rates increase

Monday, July 5th, 2010

Abbey International has announced that sterling interest rates on its popular 18 month fixed rate contracts are to be increased to 3.25% gross (3.22%AER), giving an effective rate of 4.87% over the 18 month term of the account with immediate effect.

The minimum balance required is £100,000, with the account open to both existing clients and to those with funds not currently invested with Abbey International. This is a limited offer and may be withdrawn at any time.

Abbey International has also upped the rate on its 2-Year Escalator Bond to 3.50% gross/AER in year 1 and 4.00% gross/AER in year 2, giving an excellent combination of return and safety. The minimum balance is again £100,000

Abbey International is part of the highly regarded Santander Group, which has more than 150 years experience in banking and has clients all over the world. Santander has an AA credit rating from Fitch and Aa2 rating from Moody’s credit rating agencies.